The Political Brain: The Role of Emotion in Deciding the Fate of the Nation | 
| Author: Drew Westen Publisher: PublicAffairs Category: Book
List Price: $26.95 Buy Used: $5.39 You Save: $21.56 (80%)
New (38) Used (26) from $5.39
Avg. Customer Rating: 36 reviews Sales Rank: 9795
Media: Hardcover Number Of Items: 1 Pages: 480 Shipping Weight (lbs): 1.6 Dimensions (in): 9.4 x 6.3 x 1.7
ISBN: 1586484257 Dewey Decimal Number: 324.9730019 EAN: 9781586484255 ASIN: 1586484257
Publication Date: June 25, 2007 Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days Condition: This is an unread book with poor DJ. Guaranteed good reading copy. Fast shipping from trusted wholesaler. Has remainder mark.
|
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
The Political Brain is a groundbreaking investigation into the role of emotion in determining the political life of the nation. For two decades Drew Westen, professor of psychology and psychiatry at Emory University, has explored a theory of the mind that differs substantially from the more "dispassionate" notions held by most cognitive psychologists, political scientists, and economists—and Democratic campaign strategists. The idea of the mind as a cool calculator that makes decisions by weighing the evidence bears no relation to how the brain actually works. When political candidates assume voters dispassionately make decisions based on "the issues," they lose. That's why only one Democrat has been re-elected to the presidency since Franklin Roosevelt—and only one Republican has failed in that quest.
In politics, when reason and emotion collide, emotion invariably wins. Elections are decided in the marketplace of emotions, a marketplace filled with values, images, analogies, moral sentiments, and moving oratory, in which logic plays only a supporting role. Westen shows, through a whistle-stop journey through the evolution of the passionate brain and a bravura tour through fifty years of American presidential and national elections, why campaigns succeed and fail. The evidence is overwhelming that three things determine how people vote, in this order: their feelings toward the parties and their principles, their feelings toward the candidates, and, if they haven't decided by then, their feelings toward the candidates' policy positions.
Westen turns conventional political analyses on their head, suggesting that the question for Democratic politics isn't so much about moving to the right or the left but about moving the electorate. He shows how it can be done through examples of what candidates have said—or could have said—in debates, speeches, and ads. Westen's discoveries could utterly transform electoral arithmetic, showing how a different view of the mind and brain leads to a different way of talking with voters about issues that have tied the tongues of Democrats for much of forty years—such as abortion, guns, taxes, and race. You can't change the structure of the brain. But you can change the way you appeal to it. And here's how…
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 31 more reviews...
How do people decide - in polititcs and elsewhere September 15, 2008 This book does a very good job of exposing the decision making process in general. The the writer explores the subject of how people respond to the messages of politicians and describes numerous studies on the effectiveness of political campaigns. However, the insights that one can gain from these observations go much beyond the political sphere. The insights reveal the very nature of how people respond to external messages.
As the writer mentions, it is not just democrats who overrate the rational aspects of decision making process. The flawed thinking is shared by many others in the field of marketing, sales, general management and simply put - in every day life. The book shows how people are inherently wired to make decisions based on the emotional impact of the message to one's "value system". Once the decision is made, people tend to rationalize it by giving "rational reasons" for the decision. The writer does a brilliant job of showing how to structure the messages to make them effective. This is a very valuable book for any one interested in honing one's communication skills in general. Especially useful for people in the field of sales and marketing.
The Political Brain is a good read during this election season July 4, 2008 This book is an excellent read for those political junkies who are following this election day by day.
Fascinating and compelling June 29, 2008 1 out of 1 found this review helpful
As a psychotherapist and author, I'm amazed at how Westen makes such a complex, well researched subject so compelling and fascinating. I am rarely a nonfiction reader out of my genre of psychology, but this book is a pleasure to read. Westen explains how the parts of the brain work together and helps us easily understand the role of emotion in deciding not just the fate of the nation but everything political. I have recommended this book to all my friends.
a must read May 14, 2008 Drew Westen draws on both basic neuropsych research and political research. He is not always clear which of the two he is using in his conclusions. This is a well written book by a committed Democrat. His analysis of why people vote for particular candidates is interesting and believable. Yep, this is why they made Socrates drink the hemlock. A must read for all who hope to vote in an informed way or who intend to run for office.
People vote their passions! February 20, 2008 3 out of 3 found this review helpful
The Republican Party, to its credit, has exploited this fundamental principle of politics for decades, while many Democratic candidates have retreated into a "safe" strategy of not offending the electorate.
This has lead to an extremely unhealthy state of one-party dominance at many levels of government.
Westen utilizes brain science and research to prove that taking a clear stance on a controversial issue, even if it is the "wrong" stance in the view of the pollsters, will garner more votes that hiding behind a staid shield of non-offensive double-talk.
|
|
|