American Business and Political Power: Public Opinion, Elections, and Democracy (Studies in Communication, Media, and Public Opinion) | 
| Author: Mark A. Smith Publisher: University Of Chicago Press Category: Book
List Price: $20.00 Buy New: $19.09 You Save: $0.91 (5%)
New (13) Used (12) from $3.51
Avg. Customer Rating: 3 reviews Sales Rank: 1170941
Media: Paperback Number Of Items: 1 Pages: 245 Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.8 Dimensions (in): 9 x 6.1 x 0.6
ISBN: 0226764648 Dewey Decimal Number: 322.30973 EAN: 9780226764641 ASIN: 0226764648
Publication Date: October 31, 2000 Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days Shipping: Expedited shipping available Condition: NEW ! - softback by Mark A Smith with clean crisp pages - cover is also in new condition - shipped within 48 hours
|
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
Most people believe that large corporations wield enormous political power when they lobby for policies as a cohesive bloc. With this controversial book, Mark A. Smith sets conventional wisdom on its head. In a systematic analysis of postwar lawmaking, Smith reveals that business loses in legislative battles unless it has public backing. This surprising conclusion holds because the types of issues that lead businesses to band together—such as tax rates, air pollution, and product liability—also receive the most media attention. The ensuing debates give citizens the information they need to hold their representatives accountable and make elections a choice between contrasting policy programs.
Rather than succumbing to corporate America, Smith argues, representatives paradoxically become more responsive to their constituents when facing a united corporate front. Corporations gain the most influence over legislation when they work with organizations such as think tanks to shape Americans' beliefs about what government should and should not do.
|
| Customer Reviews:
A landmark book June 29, 2002 4 out of 5 found this review helpful
I have been teaching and writing about American politics for twenty five years at the college level, and can recommend this prize-winning book as a landmark in its field. No one has ever assembled the data that Smith has, and he has analyzed it expertly. The findings cut through the superifical cynicism that surrounds interest groups to reveal the limits of group power, while also suggesting the places where it still may reside.This is must reading of anyone interested in the power of business and interest groups in American national government.
Not as eye poping as the jacket promises July 23, 2001 Smith takes a tautalogical thesis, and displays that business interests don't always dominate the political sphere. Alas, it would seem, that one of the reasons business is not sucessful in this country is that it has too little power vis a vis environmental regulation, labor law, etc. Even with Smith's data and analysis, this is only the case in one domain, where busisnesses are unified in interest and action. In these very few cases, public interest is much higher than the norm and thus oposition to business is much more likely. In Smith's other domains (which capture many more policy instances), public interest is so low, that corporations almost always get what they want...some kind of policy preference from the government. While the typology developed for this study can be applied across policy making units, it is even more likely that corporate interests succeed at the state and local level.
A Timely Read In This Election Year October 5, 2000 8 out of 10 found this review helpful
Ralph Nader and Pat Buchanan are on the rampage against the influence of big business in politics. But how much power do such businesses really wield? Prof. Smith conclusively demonstrates that the power of business varies across time and issue. Business typically wins politically when it wins public opinion; otherwise politicians often side with consumers (namely their constituents who are also consumers). Smith's book deserves to be read widely in this election year. It's well written to boot.
|
|
|