Gravitation (Physics Series) | 
| Authors: Charles W. Misner, Kip S. Thorne, John Archibald Wheeler, John Wheeler, Kip Thorne Publisher: W. H. Freeman Category: Book
Buy New: $125.95
New (15) Used (11) Collectible (1) from $75.00
Avg. Customer Rating: 39 reviews Sales Rank: 196085
Media: Paperback Number Of Items: 1 Pages: 1215 Shipping Weight (lbs): 5.7 Dimensions (in): 10 x 7.9 x 2.3
ISBN: 0716703440 Dewey Decimal Number: 531.14 EAN: 9780716703440 ASIN: 0716703440
Publication Date: September 15, 1973 Availability: Usually ships in 1 to 3 weeks
|
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 34 more reviews...
The best book on General Relativity April 15, 2008 1 out of 3 found this review helpful
No book comes close to this one in comprehensive detail about General Relativity. It includes great discussions and explanations of virtually all the ramifications of General Relativity, or opens options for more exploration. Math starts out at the Algebra level, and escalates far beyond my ability. Still much of the math can be followed by those like myself who have "math anxiety."
Anyone who aspires to understand this portion of Einstein's genius can gain enormously from it.
If you do not know these authors, they are at the forefront of enlarging the comprehension of General Relativity, and physics.
Gravitation March 9, 2008 1 out of 2 found this review helpful
I have had access to this book for only about a month. Most physics-oriented books mix abstractness with errors, making their books of less value than being useless. Most mathematics books take the usual view: why make a subject comprehensible when with a little work, your book can be totally incomprehensible. The book "Gravitation" by Wheeler, Thorne, etc. is the best book I have seen both from the viewpoint of the mathematics, as well as Physics. Hoever, I still suggest using the book "Gravitation" with the books by Spain, Sokolnikoff, and Civita by your side (as a double check). I also suggest books that provide more comprehensive coverage of subjects such as Manifold theory and the Calculus of Variations, and even a book or two dealing with Differential Geometry.
Amazing - Not for beginners May 19, 2007 3 out of 9 found this review helpful
As a child I used to ask my father "Does space go on forever? And if it doesn't, what is on the otherside??' My father of course had no idea. It has since been a subtle quest of mine to fine answers to these questions. I, as well as every person on this planet, have heard Einstein's name thousands of times while growing up. He is a legend; having been dead for several decades still his face is on a poster in every mathematics room I've ever entered. But, though I've known his name since I was 3, I did not learn what it was that made him so special, or what E=MC^2 means until I was 18 years old. In my opinion, special and general relativity should be taught to every preschooler until this aspect of the universe BECOMES intuitive.
Anyways, to the book. Having only a small background in calculus (Calc I, II and multivariable calculus) and having never taken an advanced physics class past newtonian mechanics with calculus applications, I do not have the skills necessary to decipher this book - but I do not intend to put it down until I have deciphered it and understand every bit of it.
In order to learn this book, one MUST have mastered differential calculus (differential equations); without it you will find yourself lost. Also, a background in Relativity is a must. A small background will get you by - read The Elegant Universe by Brian Greene. And then you may tackle this beast. If you complete this book, you may consider yourself one of maybe half a percent of the world who truely understands Einstein's amazing accomplishments and you will understand why it is that his face is the face you have come to know as the stereotypical mad scientist.
Two books in one February 14, 2007 4 out of 6 found this review helpful
The Author attempts the very remarkable objective of satisfying everybody's needs in one single book. For that purpose the book is divided into track 1 and track 2 sections. Unfortunately, this attempt is, in my opinion, not completely successful. Advanced GR readers will surely find too many trivial topics in the book, while beginners will have difficulties even with track 1 pages. My review will provide the advanced beginner's point of view. I read all track 1 sections and a few track 2 at the beginning of the book.
The first part of the book where geometrical objects, one forms and tensors are described is very pedagogical. However, as more advanced topics are introduced you are left with the unease feeling that something important is left behind. The answer is clear, what is missing is track 2 contents, but track 2 are much more difficult to read. By reading just track 1 sections you are led too fast to the deeper results of GR. The treatment is too superficial and a lot of results are taken for granted; or referred to track 2 pages.
There are a lot of exercises and examples in the book. However, few exercises are solved and the examples frequently refer to sideways difficult physical topics, surely not meant to clarify the main text.
The huge size of the book adds up to its reading difficulties. It is heavy and overwhelming. I usually try to reduce costs by choosing paperback editions, but the size of this book could justify a hardcover version.
In summary I must say this is not a book for beginners. I found its writing style confusing and my knowledge in GR was little improved by reading track 1 sections. To my discharge I must say I read without difficulties Foster & Nightingale's and Carroll's but could not get through Wald's. My recommendation would be to start with Foster's, then continue with Carrols's and next, what's next? Misner's is surely not a good third step.
The book may be more appropriate for advanced students. I intend to follow the author's suggestions and make a second reading including the most interesting track 2 sections.
Authoritative and comprehensive January 8, 2007 3 out of 3 found this review helpful
Still very useful as a reference, but frustrating for beginners, because the book is far too verbose and assumes a certain mind-set. The authors mix the physical and mathematical notation of differential geometry, but it is doubtful if a reader mainly interested in physics will benefit from the latter. In short, MTW is good for in-depth treatment and competence, but to get started, for example the book by d'Inverno is far more efficient. Also, for the price you should get a properly bound book...
|
|
|