The Predator State: How Conservatives Abandoned the Free Market and Why Liberals Should Too | 
| Author: James Galbraith Publisher: Free Press Category: Book
List Price: $25.00 Buy New: $12.50 You Save: $12.50 (50%)
New (30) Used (5) from $12.50
Avg. Customer Rating: 3 reviews Sales Rank: 5730
Media: Hardcover Edition: 1st Free Press Hardcover Ed Number Of Items: 1 Pages: 240 Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.9 Dimensions (in): 9.1 x 6 x 1.1
ISBN: 141656683X Dewey Decimal Number: 330.973 EAN: 9781416566830 ASIN: 141656683X
Publication Date: August 5, 2008 (New: Last 30 Days) Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days Shipping: Expedited shipping available Shipping: International shipping available Condition: Brand New. 100% money back guarantee. All books shipped from Strand Bookstore, New York City, USA.
|
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description The cult of the free market has dominated economic policy-talk since the Reagan revolution of nearly thirty years ago. Tax cuts and small government, monetarism, balanced budgets, deregulation, and free trade are the core elements of this dogma, a dogma so successful that even many liberals accept it. But a funny thing happened on the bridge to the twenty-first century. While liberals continue to bow before the free-market altar, conservatives in the style of George W. Bush have abandoned it altogether. That is why principled conservatives -- the Reagan true believers -- long ago abandoned Bush.Enter James K. Galbraith, the iconoclastic economist. In this riveting book, Galbraith first dissects the stale remains of Reaganism and shows how Bush and company had no choice except to dump them into the trash. He then explores the true nature of the Bush regime: a "corporate republic," bringing the methods and mentality of big business to public life; a coalition of lobbies, doing the bidding of clients in the oil, mining, military, pharmaceutical, agribusiness, insurance, and media industries; and a predator state, intent not on reducing government but rather on diverting public cash into private hands. In plain English, the Republican Party has been hijacked by political leaders who long since stopped caring if reality conformed to their message. Galbraith follows with an impertinent question: if conservatives no longer take free markets seriously, why should liberals? Why keep liberal thought in the straitjacket of pay-as-you-go, of assigning inflation control to the Federal Reserve, of attempting to "make markets work"? Why not build a new economic policy based on what is really happening in this country? The real economy is not a free-market economy. It is a complex combination of private and public institutions, including Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, higher education, the housing finance system, and a vast federal research establishment. The real problems and challenges -- inequality, climate change, the infrastructure deficit, the subprime crisis, and the future of the dollar -- are problems that cannot be solved by incantations about the market. They will be solved only with planning, with standards and other policies that transcend and even transform markets. A timely, provocative work whose message will endure beyond this election season, The Predator State will appeal to the broad audience of thoughtful Americans who wish to understand the forces at work in our economy and culture and who seek to live in a nation that is both prosperous and progressive.
|
| Customer Reviews:
Approved Contradiction August 19, 2008 3 out of 3 found this review helpful
With The Predator State James K. Galbraith brings the insightful analysis of The New Industrial State and The Affluent Society to bear on the shambles of the 21st century US economy. In part one Galbraith demolishes the standard arguments about deficits, free trade, shopping, interest rates, tax cuts, and inflation.The rest of the book builds an alternative ... a long needed alternative. I called this review The Approved Contradiction in homage to the classic The New Industrial State; in the 21st century economic freedom (the freedom to shop) is actually it's opposite. It is unfreedom. But no one dares admit it. Great book Jamie!
Wrong Again... August 19, 2008 1 out of 5 found this review helpful
Galbraith asks a legitimate question: if conservatives no longer take free markets seriously, why should liberals? The answer to this question is that numerous studies indicate that free markets work better than government managed systems. For example see: Dawson, John W. (2007) "Regulation and the Macroeconomy." Kyklos, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 60(1), pages 15-36, 02, Neumark, David and William Wascher, "The Effect of New Jersey's Minimum Wage Increase on Fast-Food Employment: A Reevaluation Using Payroll Records." American Economic Review, Vol. 90, No. 5 (December), pp. 1362-96, L. Cole and Lee E. Ohanian "New Deal Policies and the Persistence of the Great Depression: A General Equilibrium Analysis August 2004 Journal of Political Economy, Christian Broda and John Romalis: Inequality and Prices: Does China Benefit the Poor in America? (online), Jerry Hausman and Ephraim Leibtag Consumer Benefits from Increased Competition in Shopping Outlets: Measuring the Effect of Wal-Mart (online), Haan, J. and Siermann, C. (1998) "Further Evidence on the Relationship Between Economic Freedom and Economic Growth." Public Choice 95: 363-380. Pitlik, H. (2002) "The Path of Liberalization and Economic Growth." Kyklos 55: 57-80,Gwartney, J., Holcombe, R., and Lawson, R. (1999) "Economic Freedom and the Environment for Economic Growth." Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics vol 155 (4); pp 643-663, Rabushka, A. (1979) Hong Kong: a Study in Economic Freedom. University of Chicago Press, "Social Security and Saving: New time Series Evidence," by Martin Feldstein, National Tax Journal, 1996,
Now that Republicans are in power it is personally advantageous for them to work the Federal system to their own benefit. Galbraith would not find this result too surprising, if had had sufficient knowledge of Public Choice Theory (i.e. the application of economic reasoning to politics). If Galbraith understood Public Choice economics, he would realize that it is an inherent defect of big government that it favors special interests, especially big business (and also big labor). This is a hard concept for Galbraith to fathom, because it suggests that his dream of an activist state that works for "the common good" instead of special interests is nothing but a pipedream, a utopian fantasy.
Galbraith largely ignores the strongest arguments and evidence in favor of free markets, and against government planning. Galbraith does mention a few cases where government planning went wrong (i.e. a Chinese dam project that failed miserably). But he jumps to strong conclusions about the need for government planning in many areas without proving his case. In the end this book presents `feel good' arguments that might assure committed leftists that their case for government planning is proven. Critical readers will find this books arguments inadequate. Well informed readers will recognize that Galbraith is just plain wrong. The use of faulty arguments and misleading or invalid evidence in support of an ideologically driven agenda is nothing new for Galbraith. On the contrary, authorship of this type of book by a Galbraith is a family tradition.
I love this book August 18, 2008 5 out of 7 found this review helpful
Searing insights into neoclassical economics (the academic standard),past conservative economic policies, and liberal acquiesence to the conservative mantra of free markets. This book is a must (so are all good commentaries)even for those that profess ignorance of economics in companionship with McCain. If you want to know why the U. S. is terribly awry and needs attention and sweat and great effort to come about to some semblance of normalcy but you didn't have the metaphors or knowledge to tackle the contortions of the past and present, read this even if you are not an economist. This is about the enslavement of our government to the will of the wealthy and the corporations and how and what can be done. Most who pay attention know this, but do they understand it quite as well as elucidated by this great economist?
An long ago graduate in economics,and, institutional economist from, U. of Texas,Austin
|
|
|