Wolverine Books
Search Advanced SearchView Cart   Checkout   
 Location:  Home » Books » General » Educating Lawyers Now and Then: An Essay Comparing the 2007 and 1914 Carnegie Foundation Reports on Legal Education  
Categories
Books
DVDs
Music
Magazines
VHS
Food
Jewelry
Apparel
Sporting Goods
Outdoor
Subcategories
Mass Market
Trade

BlogRoll

Travel With Books

Related Categories
• General
Law
Subjects
Books
• General AAS
Law
Subjects
Books
• Paperback
Binding (binding)
Refinements
Books
• Printed Books
Format (feature_browse-bin)
Refinements
Books

Educating Lawyers Now and Then: An Essay Comparing the 2007 and 1914 Carnegie Foundation Reports on Legal Education

Educating Lawyers Now and Then: An Essay Comparing the 2007 and 1914 Carnegie Foundation Reports on Legal Education
Author: James R. Maxeiner & Josef Redlich
Publisher: Vandeplas Publishing
Category: Book

List Price: $34.95
Buy New: $32.33
You Save: $2.62 (7%)



New (11) Used (2) from $32.33

Sales Rank: 1427951

Media: Paperback
Pages: 164
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.6
Dimensions (in): 9.3 x 6.4 x 0.2

ISBN: 1600420338
Dewey Decimal Number: 340
EAN: 9781600420337
ASIN: 1600420338

Publication Date: January 25, 2008
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days

Similar Items:

  • Educating Lawyers: Preparation for the Profession of Law (JB-Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching)
  • How Judges Think
  • I Dissent: Great Opposing Opinions in Landmark Supreme Court Cases
  • Ipse Dixit: How the World Looks to a Federal Judge
  • The Lawyer Myth: A Defense of the American Legal Profession

Editorial Reviews:

Product Description
In 1910 the Carnegie Foundation released its first study of graduate education: the Flexner report on medical education. American medical education is already celebrating the centennial of this report, which changed the face of medical education by emphasizing the scientific basis of practice. Four years later the Foundation authored its first report on legal education, the Redlich Report, which like the Flexner Report, emphasized the scientific basis of practice. For whatever reason perhaps because legal education was less receptive to change than was medical education, perhaps because the report s author came from one of the Central Powers with which the United States was shortly to go to war the Redlich Report did not change the face of legal education. Today, legal education is much the same as it was in 1914. In 2007 the Carnegie Foundation returned to legal education and issued a new report, Educating Lawyers: Preparation for the Practice of Law. In analysis of American legal education, the two reports are eerily similar. But they are very different in their prescriptions for the future. The new report is intended to foster appreciation for what legal education does at its best. Its modest prescription for the future is an increase in clinical education. The Redlich Report, on the other hand, in its import is not limited to legal education. It is a calm but ambitious call to invigorat[e] the principle of social and economic justice in the life of the American people. The Redlich Report is must reading for any discussion of the future of American law. It brings to American legal education a perspective that no report before or since could. It reminds contemporary legal educators of their responsibility for the legal system. This re-issue of the Redlich Report is introduced by an essay by James R. Maxeiner that critically compares the two reports. The aim of the book is the reform of American law on a scientific basis. The book includes a reprint of the 1914 report: The Common Law and the Case Method in American University Law Schools by Josef Redlich

Powered by Associate-O-Matic

Contact Wolverine Books