The Cedarville Conspiracy: Indicting U.S. Steel | 
| Author: L. Stephen Cox
Publisher: University of Michigan Press/Regional
Category: Book
List Price: $16.95
Buy New: $7.75
You Save: $9.20 (54%)
New (12) Used (11) from $7.75
Avg. Customer Rating:  4 reviews
Sales Rank: 1400375
Media: Paperback
Number Of Items: 1
Pages: 278
Shipping Weight (lbs): 1
Dimensions (in): 9 x 6 x 0.9
ISBN: 0472030639
Dewey Decimal Number: 346.730323
EAN: 9780472030637
ASIN: 0472030639
Publication Date: March 14, 2005
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Shipping: Expedited shipping available
Condition: In publisher's shrinkwrap - Satisfaction Guaranteed
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
On the morning of May 7, 1965, the American freighter Cedarville collided with the Norwegian vessel Topdalsfjord in heavy fog in the Straits of Mackinac. Ultimately, ten crew members of the Cedarville died and a legal battle ensued implicating U.S. Steel---the company that owned the Cedarville---in the chain of events leading to the tragedy.
The Cedarville Conspiracy is the story of that doomed ship and its crew. It is also the first Great Lakes history to expose the heroism, villainy, courage, and confusion surrounding the Cedarville disaster.
In atmospheric, cinematic style, L. Stephen Cox's gripping page-turner dramatizes the events surrounding the collision between the Norwegian and American freighters. As the mortally wounded Cedarville began to list and sink, U.S. Steel refused to allow the crew to escape to safety, while the captain secretly donned his life jacket and abandoned the sinking ship. Ten seamen died in the frigid waters that morning as the captain and survivors swam to safety.
Researching the story, author L. Stephen Cox interviewed the surviving crew and their rescuers and attorneys, examined more than 20,000 pages of Coast Guard reports, and discovered deposition transcripts and other documentary evidence that detailed the deterioration of the ship, the captain's disregard of Great Lakes navigational rules, the company's participation in the decision to confine the men aboard the sinking vessel, and the subsequent efforts by U.S. Steel to manipulate the evidence.
|
| Customer Reviews:
 Exciting as well as respectful... June 3, 2005
9 out of 17 found this review helpful
The Cedarville Conspiracy is a phenomonal story that should have been told long ago. The dialogue which I thought brought the story to life proved to be an effective way to keep the reader's interest. While I was reading the Cedarville Conspiracy, I found that it was impossible to put the book down. Mr. Cox's highly exciting writing style is most interesting in that he was able to keep a timeline going with all the parties--the workers and their families, the ships and Bradley Fleet headquarters. I felt empathy for the people of Rogers City. The book portrayed their strength and bravery in handling this horrible situation that could have been avoided had it not been for the corporate greed of U.S. Steel. I look forward to reading further writings by Mr. Cox.
 Well researched and carefully documented June 2, 2005
9 out of 16 found this review helpful
Prior to reading Mr. Cox's well-researched and carefully-documented account of the tragic events of May 7, 1965, I had never heard of the Cedarville, nor was I aware of any of the particulars of the steel industry during the mid-20th century. I found Mr. Cox's account of the events leading up to the collision and sinking of the ship riveting, particularly in regard to the actions and inactions of the ship's owner, U.S. Steel. Having read the book myself, I find it difficult to understand the petty nature of the criticisms it has received from people whose lives were critically impacted by the tragedy. The events described in this book occurred almost 40 years ago, meaning that details surrounding the collision have naturally been forgotten even by those who experienced the event. Mr. Cox's account is in fact based on the most reliable of all possible sources of information--i.e., the court record of the trial that occurred immediately after the collision, which contains the verbatim testimony of all the witnesses. Mr. Cox's decision to base his book primarily on the court record containing the exact statements of those eyewitnesses, given at a time when their memories would have been very fresh (and certainly much fresher than they would have been 40 years later when Mr. Cox researched the book), rather than basing it on interviews with each and every surviving witness, in fact demonstrates his commitment to truth. Further, Mr. Cox explains very clearly that some of the conversations and encounters in the book are fictionalized, added for the sole purpose of creating interest, helping the reader understand the viewpoint of the principals, and moving the story forward. Ultimately, Mr. Cox should be commended for his efforts to bring to light the details of a tragedy that the world would otherwise probably have forgotten. The people whose lives were impacted by that tragedy, for whom Mr. Cox shows the greatest of respect, compassion, and concern, should understand that better than anyone.
 Fiction Rather Than Fact May 29, 2005
11 out of 19 found this review helpful
I have never heard of Stephen Cox but I have known Edward Brewster for more than 50 years. In all of those years I have never known him to lie or deceive anyone. I have heard Ed's story of the sinking of the Cedarville and his harrowing survival on numerous occasions. I know that he was NOT hospitalized after his rescue, nor, he tells me, was he interviewed by Mr. Cox. I have no idea why Mr. Cox would attribute inaccurate statements to Ed. The Cedarville collision and sinking was a disaster but to fictionalize the events makes one wonder why the book was written. The true story is a a dramatic tale without the need to fictionalize some events.
Cedarville Survivor May 20, 2005
16 out of 21 found this review helpful
My name is Edward Brewster and I am one of the 25 survivors (not24 as Mr. Cox states on page 210) of the sinking of the SS Cedarville on May 7th, 1965. I had looked forward to reading this book but I was extremely disappointed when I did. I found many parts untrue. The ship was seaworthy; it was not rat infested; to my knowledge, it was never overloaded (in fact, I personally checked the draft the morning of May 7th when we finished loading; we did not have to adjust the cargo in order to close the hatches. When loading the ship, we never had to go into the slip bow first and then turn around and back in to finish loading. Mr. Cox had me attempting to get into the port lifeboat - in fact, I was in the starboard lifeboat, which ended up under the ship. In the book, Mr. Cox says that I was a Deckwatchman, I was a Watchman and relief wheelsman. He said that I was a patient in the hospital, with my wife sitting on my bed, I was treated in the Emergency Room and released. The Preface states "Conversations and actions of the surviving crewmen and their families are taken directly from the exhaustive personal accounts reflected in their depositions, correspondence, personal notes, hearing transcripts, diaries, logbooks, and press accounts". I know of only one survivor that he spoke with. I know that the conversations of my wife and grandmother did not take place. In fact, my grandmother's true experience would have been much more interesting. The book was written as if it was based on documented facts. Actually, so much of it is fiction and is written in such a way that the reader is led to believe that everything in the book is accurate. I know for sure what happened. I was there and I worked on this ship for five years. I can remember everything that happened that day as if it were taking place today.
Edward Brewster
|
|
|
