Imperfect Knowledge Economics: Exchange Rates and Risk | 
| Authors: Roman Frydman, Michael D. Goldberg Creator: Edmund S. Phelps Publisher: Princeton University Press Category: Book
List Price: $55.00 Buy New: $48.07 You Save: $6.93 (13%)
New (20) Used (8) from $41.96
Avg. Customer Rating: 1 reviews Sales Rank: 147608
Media: Hardcover Number Of Items: 1 Pages: 368 Shipping Weight (lbs): 1.5 Dimensions (in): 9.3 x 6.3 x 1.2
ISBN: 0691121605 Dewey Decimal Number: 330 EAN: 9780691121604 ASIN: 0691121605
Publication Date: August 13, 2007 Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days Shipping: International shipping available Condition: New, neatly stored and in excellent condition. International orders via air mail except large books.
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
Posing a major challenge to economic orthodoxy, Imperfect Knowledge Economics asserts that exact models of purposeful human behavior are beyond the reach of economic analysis. Roman Frydman and Michael Goldberg argue that the longstanding empirical failures of conventional economic models stem from their futile efforts to make exact predictions about the consequences of rational, self-interested behavior. Such predictions, based on mechanistic models of human behavior, disregard the importance of individual creativity and unforeseeable sociopolitical change. Scientific though these explanations may appear, they usually fail to predict how markets behave. And, the authors contend, recent behavioral models of the market are no less mechanistic than their conventional counterparts: they aim to generate exact predictions of "irrational" human behavior. Frydman and Goldberg offer a long-overdue response to the shortcomings of conventional economic models. Drawing attention to the inherent limits of economists' knowledge, they introduce a new approach to economic analysis: Imperfect Knowledge Economics (IKE). IKE rejects exact quantitative predictions of individual decisions and market outcomes in favor of mathematical models that generate only qualitative predictions of economic change. Using the foreign exchange market as a testing ground for IKE, this book sheds new light on exchange-rate and risk-premium movements, which have confounded conventional models for decades. Offering a fresh way to think about markets and representing a potential turning point in economics, Imperfect Knowledge Economics will be essential reading for economists, policymakers, and professional investors.
|
| Customer Reviews:
Imperfect is right... March 31, 2008 3 out of 16 found this review helpful
"Imperfect Knowledge Economics" has as its central tenet that most modern economic models are flawed because they are based on the idea that people always act "rationally" (i.e. we always have perfect information, we never suffer from external constraints, and our goals are always to maximize economic value). The book then proposes a new way to think about economics, suggesting that because people act as people the best that economists can do is to make vague general predictions about the future.
Of course, to any non-economist who pays any attention to economic forecasts, all of this is met with a resounding "DUH". The one nice thing about this book is that it hopefully will be read by other economists, and get them to finally realize what most of us have already understood for quite a while, that economists are often the last ones to actually understand what *people* will be thinking, feeling and doing - and of course *people* are ultimately the driving force behind economic markets. (For example: witness how long it took for economists to start saying the word "recession" during this spring of 2008. It turns out that spending data show that consumers knew that poor economic times were coming all the back in the late fall of 2007. Somehow the economists were the last ones to figure this out.) Probably interesting if you are an economist, or you need to deal with economists on a regular basis (certainly if you need to *argue* with an economist). However other than that, its not going to be all that useful for the rest of us as we already know, understand, and have seen the authors' main points for quite a long time.
|
|
|