Wall Street: America's Dream Palace (Icons of America) | 
| Author: Steve Fraser Publisher: Yale University Press Category: Book
List Price: $22.00 Buy New: $12.75 You Save: $9.25 (42%)
New (38) Used (5) from $10.50
Avg. Customer Rating: 3 reviews Sales Rank: 158130
Media: Hardcover Number Of Items: 1 Pages: 208 Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.8 Dimensions (in): 8.3 x 5.4 x 0.8
ISBN: 0300117558 Dewey Decimal Number: 332.64273 EAN: 9780300117554 ASIN: 0300117558
Publication Date: April 22, 2008 Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
|
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
Wall Street: no other place on earth is so singularly identified with money and the power of money. And no other American institution has inspired such deep moral, cultural, and political ambivalence. Is the Street an unbreachable bulwark defending commercial order? Or is it a center of mad ambition? This book recounts the colorful history of America’s love-hate relationship with Wall Street. Steve Fraser frames his fascinating analysis around the roles of four iconic Wall Street types—the aristocrat, the confidence man, the hero, and the immoralist—all recurring figures who yield surprising insights about how the nation has wrestled, and still wrestles, with fundamental questions of wealth and work, democracy and elitism, greed and salvation. Spanning the years from the first Wall Street panic of 1792 to the dot.com bubble-and-bust and Enron scandals of our own time, the book is full of stories and portraits of such larger-than-life figures as J. P. Morgan, Cornelius Vanderbilt, and Michael Milken. Fraser considers the conflicting attitudes of ordinary Americans toward the Street and concludes with a brief rumination on the recent notion of Wall Street as a haven for Everyman.
|
| Customer Reviews:
Enormously Informative June 21, 2008 1 out of 2 found this review helpful
Steve Fraser has a wonderful, crisp style that moves your eye along the page and onto the next. This is one of those rare non-fiction books you wish were longer.
Very selective take on history June 8, 2008 8 out of 40 found this review helpful
Let me save you $20 and a few hours of your time by rewriting this book it two sentences:
1. Wall St is, and has always been, run by a crazy little clan of megalomaniacs that exist solely to rape the American proletariat of the little wealth they manage to accumulate. 2. Every major financial crisis the US has suffered going back to the 18th century is a direct result of the insatiable greed and utter lack of any humanistic instinct that pervades Wall St.
These are some pretty grandiose claims, and to back them up, the author employs some pretty interesting logic. Let's take the 2000 internet bubble as an example. Our author makes the claim that the bubble was inflated by those evil Wall St people peddling their sure-to-fail internet companies to the unsuspecting public. OK, I guess we can overlook the fact that people knew from the get-go that these companies were highly speculative, given that they earned no revenue and had no real plan as to how they ever would (and if a person doesn't realize that this makes for a pretty risky investment, I hope they're a lot better at their day job), but for the sake of argument I'll stick it out. The author goes on to claim that the reason the common man was duped into buying all this uber-risky stock was that those crafty Wall St investment bankers had in their pockets the research departments that were tasked with putting out unbiased reports on the stock. Now, this again overlooks the fact that we're talking about companies with $0 revenue, and I'm not really clear on how the research analysts massaged that little detail away, but this is nevertheless one of the author's more plausible claims. My biggest issue comes with one of his proposed solutions to the issue. He claims that following the stock market bubble and the subsequent Enron/Tyco type blow-ups the government basically did nothing except enact the impotent Sarbanes-Oxley Act. What does the author suggest? He would have considered re-enacting the Glass-Steagall Act. For those who don't know, this act from 1933-1999 outlawed banks from having both commercial and investment banking activities under the same legal roof. Well I hate to burst your bubble, Steve, but this would do absolutely nothing to solve the conflict of interest between investment bankers and research analysts, the issue you cite as the main cause of the whole debacle, as both divisions fall within the investment bank, neither is a commercial banking activity. Sarbanes-Oxley, on the other hand, forced banks to establish very strictly enforced "Chinese Walls" between investment banking and research operations, a solution that actually address the problem. And as for SOXs impotence, if the author doubts the efficacy of post SOX Chinese Walls, I challenge him to go to any bulge bracket bank and attempt to contact a research analyst from within investment banking, either your call/email will not go through at all, or it will be automatically redirected to the compliance department; and good luck trying to have a face to face chat. But all this requires an assessment of facts and an honest analysis, something our author doesn't really seem so keen on.
I think the best illustration of his true motive in writing this book is to note that after all his villanizing of men like JP Morgan, Andrew Carnegie, and other Gilded Age tycoons, he never bothers to mention that later in life and upon their deaths many of their fortunes were given away. And without their generous philanthropy New York wouldn't be home to many of the great museums, libraries, schools, hospitals, and art galleries it is today. I wonder how much the authors beloved FDR left of his substantial wealth to charity?
Lastly, the book isn't even written well. It's extremely verbose and full of arcane language. Am I supposed to be impressed? I'm not, I have a thesaurus too. Perhaps the thinking was, "the facts don't bear me out, maybe I can confuse them to death."
In the end, it's really to bad the author couldn't set aside his very obvious political sentiments to write an honest history of Wall St, that's really what I wanted, not a politically motivated smear campaign, which is what I got.
Wall Street June 5, 2008 7 out of 9 found this review helpful
Wonderful, thorough history of the banking industry and Wall Street since the inception of this country. A must read! Debb
|
|
|