|
A Common Law of International Adjudication (International Courts and Tribunals Series) | 
| Author: Chester Dr. Brown
Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA
Category: Book
List Price: $150.00
Buy New: $116.10
You Save: $33.90 (23%)
New (16) Used (8) from $106.14
Sales Rank: 1058538
Media: Hardcover
Number Of Items: 1
Pages: 280
Shipping Weight (lbs): 1.5
Dimensions (in): 9.2 x 6.2 x 1.1
ISBN: 0199206503
Dewey Decimal Number: 341.55
EAN: 9780199206506
ASIN: 0199206503
Publication Date: October 25, 2007
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Condition: Brand new Book ,ALL days Low Price !
|
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
The proliferation of international courts and tribunals has given rise to several new issues affecting the administration of international justice. This book makes a significant contribution to understanding the impact of this proliferation by addressing one important question: namely, whether international courts and tribunals are increasingly adopting common approaches to issues of procedure and remedies. This book's central argument is that there is an increasing commonality in the practice of international courts to the application of rules concerning these issues, and that this represents the emergence of a common law of international adjudication.
The book examines this question by considering several key issues relating to procedure and remedies, and analyzes relevant international jurisprudence to demonstrate that there is substantial commonality. It goes on to look at why international courts are increasingly adopting common approaches to such questions, and why a greater degree of commonality may be found with respect to some issues rather than others. In doing so, light is shed on the methods adopted by international courts to engage in the cross-fertilization of legal principles.
The emergence of a common law of international adjudication has important practical and theoretical implications, as it suggests that international courts can also devise common approaches to the challenges that they face in the age of proliferation. It also suggests that international courts do not generally operate as self-contained regimes, but rather that they regard themselves as forming part of a community of international courts, therefore having positive implications for the development of the international legal system.
|
|
|
Powered by Associate-O-Matic
| |
