Documents on the Rape of Nanking (Ann Arbor Paperbacks) | 
| Creator: Timothy Brook
Publisher: University of Michigan Press
Category: Book
List Price: $17.95
Buy New: $16.16
You Save: $1.79 (10%)
New (16) Used (9) from $13.95
Avg. Customer Rating:  7 reviews
Sales Rank: 556970
Media: Paperback
Number Of Items: 1
Pages: 320
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.9
Dimensions (in): 8 x 5.2 x 0.6
ISBN: 0472086626
Dewey Decimal Number: 940.53
EAN: 9780472086627
ASIN: 0472086626
Publication Date: December 3, 1999
Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours
|
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
The Japanese Army's invasion of China in 1937 was the first step toward a hemispheric war that would last until the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. What ended in one atrocity began with another: the savage military takeover of China's capital city, which quickly became known as the Rape of Nanking. The Japanese Army's conduct from December 1937 to February 1938 constitutes one of the most barbarous events not just of the war but of the century. The violence was documented at the time and then redocumented during the war crimes trial in Tokyo after the war. This book brings together materials from both moments to provide the first comprehensive dossier of primary sources on the Rape.
Part 1, "The Records," includes two sources written as the Rape was underway. The first is a long set of documents produced by the International Committee for the Nanking Safety Zone, a group of foreigners who strove to protect the Chinese residents. The second is a series of letters that American surgeon Dr. Robert Wilson wrote for his family during the same period. These letters are published here for the first time.
The evidence compiled by the International Committee and its members would be decisive for the indictments against Japanese leaders at the International Military Tribunal for the Far East in Tokyo. Part 2, "The Judgments," reprints portions of the tribunal's 1948 judgment dealing with the Rape of Nanking, its judicial consequences, and sections of the dissenting judgment of Justice Radhabinod Pal.
These contemporary records and judgments create an intimate firsthand account of the Rape of Nanking. Together they are intended to stimulate deeper reflection than previously possible on how and why we assess and assign the burden of war guilt.
Timothy Brook is Professor of Chinese History and Associate Director of the Joint Centre for Asia Pacific Studies, University of Toronto, and is coeditor of Nation Work: Asian Elites and National Identities and Culture and Economy: The Shaping of Capitalism in Eastern Asia, both published by the University of Michigan Press.
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 2 more reviews...
 Very Readable Primary Source Collection on Nanking Massacre June 19, 2005
16 out of 19 found this review helpful
I would highly recommend this book to anyone who desires to read primary source accounts of the war crimes committed by units of the Japanese Imperial Army in Nanking during 1937-38. The book is divided into 2 areas: The first section covers items of evidence, including correspondence to Japanese authorities in Nanking and numerous eyewitness accounts as transcribed by the International Committee for the Nanking Safety Zone. Heart-wrenching letters composed by Dr. Robert Wilson are also included in this section. The second, much-smaller part of the book details the majority opinion and findings of the International Military Tribunal in 1948. Finally, the rambling and unconvincing dissent by Justice Radhabinod Pal completes this interesting book. Many of the letters and accounts are no more than a page or two, so it can be easily read in small increments.
For those who seeking actual historical evidence after being awakened to this atrocity by Iris Chang's "Rape of Nanking", you will find it in this book. It is not exhaustive by any means, but does present the most notable accounts surrounding the Nanking massacres. Japanese ultra-nationalists have no credible rebuttal for what is fairly documented in this book and thus will say anything to dissuade you from reading it. That in itself is a ringing endorsement for the validity of "Documents on the Rape of Nanking", and the unblemished facts it provides for generations of readers.
A first hand account on a long hidden matter June 27, 2004
15 out of 25 found this review helpful
Beware of a person who sign "Hiromi". He (or she ?) has commented all the books on this subject and writes like a rith-wing extremist revisionnist.
 Good resouce, if you read it in fair mind November 17, 2003
28 out of 53 found this review helpful
The Documents of the Nanking Safety Zone is a first-class contemporary resource that lets you get the picture of what happened and not happened in Nanking in December 1937.
Members of The International Committee of the Nanking Safety Zone were of anti-Japanese sentiment, but were honest enough to wrote things like that they were unable to separate civilian refugees to the soldiers in civilian clothes hiding in the Safety Zone (that is violation of the International law) although they make protests against Japanese Army assuming these plain-clothes soldiers as "civilians", so executing of those snipers should be illegal to their eyes.
Still, they admitted that [cases 210 to 219] are only the ones [they] have been able to get first hand reports of : (the first two are the cases overlooked in typing up previous reports.)(p118) You can get the picture now. The reports they are making and handing in to the Embassy of Japan were all hearsay. On top of that, most of them were "second-hand" hearsay!
Although they wrote them as if they were witnessed by them, you can see the difference between hearsay and genuinely witnessed event : for instance, case 185 (p78) says ;
"On the morning of January 9, Mr. Kroeger and Mr. Hatz saw a Japanese officer and soldier executing a poor man in civilian clothes....." This was the only one of two "killings" that were actually witnessed ,which was testified by Rev. John G. Magee in the Tokyo Trial. This one was "legitimate execution"(p78), and the other one was a case that a man in civilian clothes who was challenged by a sentry but run away then shot. This was not murder either.
If you are a little careful about these things, you can see everything like Dr. Wilson's letters to Rabe's diary consists of hearsay. Only things they saw were actions related to the battles and its aftermath for most of them the Chinese soldiers are respnsible, not Japanese (Kuomintang propaganda department was very much in action at that time).
Nevertheless, some people still think these documents are the eyewitness evidences of the "Rape of Nanking". I don't know how or why. Maybe for them, the truth of history doesn't matter. But to the Japanese, it matters a lot because we are still on trial for these horrible false accusations.
 What Really Happened in Nanking? October 20, 2003
52 out of 113 found this review helpful
If you really need to know, you should read the following books:What Really Happened in Nanking by Tanaka Masaaki The Alleged "Nanking Massacre": Japan's rebuttal to China's forged claims by Tadao Takemoto, Yasuo Ohara Nanking : Anatomy of an Atrocity by Masahiro Yamamoto
Basic Documents on the Nanking atrocity February 16, 2002
26 out of 46 found this review helpful
This book consists of four sets of documents on the Nanking atrocity which took place in 1937 - 1938.
The first set is a part of the official documents of the Nanking Safety Zone from December 14, 1937 to February 19, 1938 which was edited and published by Hsu Shuhsi in 1939.
These documents were also used in H.J.Timperley's "What War Means: The Japanese Terror in China" and found in Rabe's diaries that were published as "The Good Man of Nanking".
The Hsu Shuhsi's book was excerpted and submitted at Tokyo war crimes trial on August, 29, 1946.
These are evidently basic historical documents on the Nanking atrocity. However they can tell us what happened in and around the Safety Zone until Feb.19, 1938.The second set of documents is a collection of family letters of Dr.Robert Wilson who served at Nanking University Hospital.
Some of his letters were appeared in Reader's Digest of October 1938.( "We Were in Nanking", p41-43)
He wrote in the letter of March 7,1938, "The Red Swastika Society has for the last month been feverishly burying bodies from all parts of the city outside the zone and from the surrounding countryside.A conservative estimate of the numbers of people slaughtered in cold blood is some what about 100,000, including of course thousand of soldiers that had thrown down their arms."(p254) The third set is "Judgement of the International Military Tribunal for the Far East" and the fourth is "The Dissenting Opinion of Radhabional Pal".
Regarding the Nanking atrocity, Pal had prejudice against the testimonies of eyewitnesses, however
he accepted that "..., the evidence is still overwhelming that atrocities were perpetuated by the members of the Japanese armed forces against the civilian population."(p278) "Introduction" written by the editor Timothy Brook is quite helpful to understand these documents.
But, readers, please remember that the these documents will never give you complete view of the Nanking atrocity, as the witnesses mostly stayed in the wall city of Nanking during the tragedy.
|
|
|
